Course Name |
Design Patterns and Code Refactoring
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
CE 611
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
Course Level |
Third Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | The goal of this course is an in depth study of design patterns and code refactoring. Design Patterns enable software professionals to avoid designing solutions from scratch which have been worked before, while refactoring studies techniques to root out bugs and identify and correct poorly structured code without changing the external behavior of the system. Design patterns improve the design “before code is written”, refactoring improves the design “after code is written”. Both design patterns and refactoring techniques allow the development of complex maintainable and extensible software systems. The pros and cons of each technique will be discussed and the students shall get an opportunity to apply these techniques through hands-on assignments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Learning Outcomes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course Description | This course is an in depth study of design patterns and code refactoring techniques which is used to develop complex, maintainable and extendible sofware systems. |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation | Learning Outcome |
1 | Introduction to Software, Software Design, UML, Design Patterns, and Refactoring | Chapter 1 Design Patterns. | |
2 | Structural Design Patterns 1 | - | |
3 | Structural Design Patterns 2 | - | |
4 | Creational Design Patterns 1 | - | |
5 | Creational Design Patterns 2 | - | |
6 | Behavioral Design Patterns 1 | - | |
7 | Behavioral Design Patterns 2 | ||
8 | Presentation 1 - Patterns in the Literature | ||
9 | Midterm | - | |
10 | Test Driven Development | - | |
11 | Refactoring 1 | - | |
12 | Refactoring 2 | - | |
13 | Refactoring 3 | ||
14 | Presentation 2 - Refactoring in the Literature | ||
15 | Review | ||
16 | Final |
Course Notes/Textbooks | “Design patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software” by E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson and J. Vlissides.Addison-Wesley. 1995. ISBN-13: 978-0-201-63361, ISBN-10: 0-201-63361-2 “Refactoring, Improving the design of existing code” by Martin Fowler, Kent Beck, John Brant, William Opdyke, Don Roberts. 1999 ISBN-13: 978-0-201-48567-7, ISBN-10: 0-201-48567-2 |
Suggested Readings/Materials | Instructor slides. |
Semester Activities | Number | Weighting | LO 1 | LO 2 | LO 3 | LO 4 | LO 5 |
Participation | |||||||
Laboratory / Application | |||||||
Field Work | |||||||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||||||
Portfolio | |||||||
Homework / Assignments |
2
|
10
|
|||||
Presentation / Jury |
2
|
10
|
|||||
Project |
1
|
20
|
|||||
Seminar / Workshop | |||||||
Oral Exams | |||||||
Midterm |
1
|
20
|
|||||
Final Exam |
1
|
40
|
|||||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
70
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
30
|
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
4
|
56
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
2
|
10
|
20
|
Presentation / Jury |
2
|
20
|
40
|
Project |
1
|
20
|
20
|
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
1
|
21
|
21
|
Final Exam |
1
|
40
|
40
|
Total |
245
|
#
|
PC Sub | Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
1 | Understands and applies the foundational theories of Computer Engineering in a high level. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
2 | Possesses a great depth and breadth of knowledge about Computer Engineering including the latest developments. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
3 | Can reach the latest information in Computer Engineering and possesses a high level of proficiency in the methods and abilities necessary to comprehend it and conduct research with it. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
4 | Conducts a comprehensive study that introduces innovation to science and technology, develops a new scientific procedure or a technological product/process, or applies a known method in a new field. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
5 | Independently understands, designs, implements and concludes a unique research process in addition to managing it. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
6 | Contributes to science and technology literature by publishing the output of his/her academic studies in respectable academic outlets. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
7 | Interprets scientific, technological, social and cultural developments and relates them to the general public with a commitment to scientific objectivity and ethical responsibility. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
8 | Performs critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation of ideas and developments in Computer Engineering. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
9 | Performs verbal and written communications with professionals as well as broader scientific and social communities in Computer Engineering, by using English at least at the European Language Portfolio C1 General level, performs written, oral and visual communications and discussions in a high level. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
10 | Develops strategies, policies and plans about systems and topics that Computer Engineering uses, and interprets the outcomes. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..