GRADUATE SCHOOL
Private Law Graduate Program (Without Thesis)
HUK 507 | Course Introduction and Application Information
| Course Name |
Commercial Arbitration Law
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
HUK 507
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
Turkish
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionGroup WorkProblem SolvingCase StudyQ&ACritical feedbackLecture / Presentation | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | ||||||
| Course Objectives | The purpose of this course is to examine the commercial arbitration, while also having regard to international conventions and to set forth its interplay with the national law. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | This course includes the topics of international arbitration, New York Convention and Geneva Convention. |
|
|
Core Courses |
X
|
| Major Area Courses | ||
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Types of Disputes, Legal Nature and History of Arbitration | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 5 – 32; Yeşilırmak ve Pekcanıtez, 2017, ss. 2593 – 2601. |
| 2 | Arbitration under the Code of Civil Procedure | Yeşilırmak ve Pekcanıtez, 2017, ss. 2593 – 2601. |
| 3 | The History and Scope of the Geneva Convention and the New York Convention and Determination of the Rules of Procedure Governing Arbitration | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 53 – 57. |
| 4 | Scope and Interpretation of the Arbitration Agreement | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 53 – 57. |
| 5 | Protection of Confidentiality in Arbitration | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 9 – 12. |
| 6 | Provisional Measures in Arbitration | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 235 – 244; Yeşilırmak ve Pekcanıtez, 2017, ss. 2714 – 2721. |
| 7 | Med-Arb Method | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 18 – 32. |
| 8 | Arbitrability | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 94 – 141; Yeşilırmak ve Pekcanıtez, 2017, ss. 2631 – 2645. |
| 9 | Expert Determination and Acting of Arbitrators as Amiable Compositeur | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 354 – 355. |
| 10 | Violation of Due Process and International Commercial Public Order in Arbitration | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 572 – 584, 620 – 634. |
| 11 | Action for Setting Aside of an Arbitral Award | Akıncı, 2021, ss. 378 – 507; Yeşilırmak ve Pekcanıtez, 2017, ss. 2732 – 2800. |
| 12 | Multilateralism in International Arbitration | Akıncı, 2017, ss. 182 – 185. |
| 13 | Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards Against Third Parties | Akıncı, 2017, ss. 168 – 172; Yeşilırmak ve Pekcanıtez, 2017, ss. 2678 – 2684. |
| 14 | Res Iudicata and Arbitral Awards | Yeşilırmak ve Pekcanıtez, 2017, ss. 2789 – 2800. |
| 15 | Review of the Course | |
| 16 | Final Exam |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Akıncı, Z., 2021. Milletlerarası Tahkim, 6. Bası. ed. Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul. ISBN: 9786057036483; Yeşilırmak, A., Pekcanıtez, H., 2017. Tahkim, in: Pekcanıtez, H., Özekes, M., Akkan, M., Taş Korkmaz, H. (Eds.), Medeni Usul Hukuku Cilt -III-. On İki Levha, Istanbul. ISBN: 9786051524832 |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Kalpsüz, T., 2010. Türkiye’de Milletlerarası Tahkim, 2. Bası. ed. Yetkin Yayınevi, Ankara. ISBN: 9789754645323; Deren - Yıldırım, N., 2004. Milletlerarası Tahkimin Esaslı Sorunları. Alkım, İstanbul. ISBN: 9753373473; Yeşilova, B., 2008. Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Nihai Karardan Önce Mahkemelerin Yardımı ve Denetimi. Güncel Yayınevi, İzmir. ISBN: 9789756187296 |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation | ||
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
40
|
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm | ||
| Final Exam |
1
|
60
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
40
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
60
|
| Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
1
|
14
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
81
|
81
|
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
0
|
||
| Final Exam |
1
|
82
|
82
|
| Total |
225
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
| 1 | To consolidate the ability of interpretation of events on the basis of legal principles by analytical thinking in the field of private law. | X | ||||
| 2 | The acquisition of knowledge on private law and its sub-disciplines. | X | ||||
| 3 | To generate new information putting together the knowledge of various disciplines with theoretical and applied ones that are gained from expert level of private law. | X | ||||
| 4 | To have the ability for utilizing theoretical and applied knowledge gaining from expert level of private law on the analysis of the problems. | X | ||||
| 5 | To be able to interpret with a critical point of view by making connection between legal concepts, institutions and methods. | X | ||||
| 6 | To be able to convey the expert level of knowledge and equipment that will be possessed on private law and its sub-disciplines effectively verbally and in writing. | X | ||||
| 7 | To be able to solve legal disputes, particularly those brought before the judicial bodies. | X | ||||
| 8 | To be able to have effective communication skills. | X | ||||
| 9 | To pursue social, scientific and ethical values during the processing and evaluation of knowledge. | X | ||||
| 10 | To be able to conduct an independent study that requires specialty in the field of private law and about its sub-disciplines. | X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest