GRADUATE SCHOOL
Political Science and International Relations (With Thesis)
PSIR 502 | Course Introduction and Application Information
Course Name |
Theories of International Relations
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
PSIR 502
|
Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Required
|
|||||
Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) |
Course Objectives | This course will help the students to both develop their critical thinking on main themes of IR such as conflict, security, power, self-determination, integration and globalization from different theoretical perspectives and apply various mainstream and critical theories of International Relations to real-world cases. |
Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description | This graduate seminar surveys the main theoretical and analytical approaches encountered in the study of international relations. |
|
Core Courses |
X
|
Major Area Courses | ||
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
1 | Introduction | |
2 | What is IR Theory and why do we need it? | Smith, S. (2016). "Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory", in Dunne et al. (Eds.), International Relations Theories, Ch. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, S. (1995). "The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory", in K. Booth & S. Smith (Eds.)., International Relations Theory Today (pp.1-19), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Singer, J. D. (1961). “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations,” World Politics, 14 (1), pp. 77-92. |
3 | Classical and Structural Realism | Carr, E.H. (2000). The Twenty Years’ Crisis. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Ch. 1-6. Morgenthau, H. J. (1945) “The Evil of Politics and the Ethics of Evil’, Ethics, 56 (1), pp. 1-18. Guzzini, S. (2004), “The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism”, European Journal of International Relations, 10 (4), pp. 533-568. Waltz, K. N. (1990), “Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory”, Journal of International Affairs, 44 (1), pp. 21-37. |
4 | Liberalism(s) | Wilson, P. (2003). “What is Idealism?” in The International Theory of Leonard Woolf: A Study in Twentieth-Century Idealism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Ch. 2. Keohane, R. (2004), http://www.uctv.tv/shows/Theory-and-International-Institutions-with-Robert-O-Keohane-Conversations-with-History-8991 Doyle, M. (1983). "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part I," Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12 (3), pp. 205-235. Owen, J. (1994). "How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace," International Security, 19 (2), pp. 87-125. Oneal, J., Russett, B., & Berbaum, M. (2003). “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992”. International Studies Quarterly, 47 (3), 371-393. |
5 | Constructivism | Wendt, A. (1992). “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics,” International Organization, 46 (2), pp. 391‐425. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 92‐192 Hurd, I. (1999). “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,” International Organization, 53 (2), pp. 379‐408. |
6 | Marxism and Critical Theory | Linklater, A. (2005). “Marxism” in Burchill, S. (Ed.), Theories of International Relations. London: Palgrave, Ch. 5. Linklater, A. (1986). “Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory.” Review of International Studies, 12 (4), pp. 301–312. Cox, R. W. (1983). “Gramsci, Hegemony and IR”, Millennium, 12 (2), pp. 162-175. |
7 | Midterm | |
8 | The English School | Buzan, B. (2001). "The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR", Review of International Studies, 27 (3), pp. 471-88. Bull, H. (1971). “Order vs. Justice in International Society”, Political Studies, 19 (3), pp. 269-83. |
9 | Poststructuralism | Foucault, M. (1980) “Truth and Power”. in Gordon. C. (Ed.). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 109-133. Der Derian, J. (2000). ‘Virtuous War / Virtual Theory,’ International Affairs, 76 (4), pp. 771-788. Dillon, M. and Guerrero, L. L. (2008). “Biopolitics of Security in the 21st Century: an Introduction”, Review of International Studies, 34 (2), pp. 265-292. |
10 | Postcolonialism | Said, E. (2003) Orientalism, London: Penguin, pp. 1-49. Darby, P., & Paolini, A. J. (1994). “Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism”. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 19 (3), 371–397. Seth, S. (2011). “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations”. Millennium, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. |
11 | New Approaches in IR and the Transforming Definition of Security | Tickner, A. (1997). “You just don’t understand: troubled engagements between feminist and IR theorists”, International Studies Quarterly, 41 (4), pp. 611-632. Kinnvall, C. (2004). “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security”. Political Psychology, 25 (5), pp. 741-767. Rumelili, B. & Adisonmez, U. C. (2020). “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Kimlik-Güvenlik İlişkisine Dair Yeni bir Paradigma: Ontolojik Güvenlik Teorisi” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 17 (66), pp. 23-39. Lukes, S. (2005). “Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds”, Millennium, 33 (3), pp. 477-493. Buzan, B. (1984). “Peace, Power, and Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations”. Journal of Peace Research, 21 (2), pp. 109-125. Stein, J. G. (2013). “Threat perception in international relations”. in L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 364–394. Adisonmez, U. C. (2016). “What is the Human Security Approach and How the Phenomenon Contributed to the International Security Agenda: Canadian and Japanese Paradigms”. Security Strategies Journal, 12 (24), pp. 1-28. |
12 | Project Presentations | |
13 | Project Presentations | |
14 | Project Presentations | |
15 | General overview of the course | |
16 | Final Exam |
Course Notes/Textbooks | No particular course book, but students are advised to acquire the below book in order to track the weekly discussions: Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki ve Steve Smith (Eds.) (2016). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
*All course readings are available at the University Library and as open sources. |
Suggested Readings/Materials | Moran M. Mandelbaum (2019). The Nation/State Fantasy: From Gellner to Lacan. Palgrace Macmillan. Brent Steele (2008) Ontological Security in Intrernational Relations: Self-Identitiy and the IR State. Routledge. |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation |
1
|
20
|
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments | ||
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
20
|
Project | ||
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exams | ||
Midterm |
1
|
20
|
Final Exam |
1
|
40
|
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
60
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
40
|
Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
16
|
7
|
112
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
15
|
15
|
Project |
0
|
||
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
1
|
20
|
20
|
Final Exam |
1
|
30
|
30
|
Total |
225
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
1 | To be able to improve theoretical and conceptual proficiencies on Political Science and International Relations and use them competently. |
X | ||||
2 | To be able to evaluate critically the relationships between various factors in the field of Political Science and International Relations such as structures, actors, institutions and culture. |
X | ||||
3 | To be able to determine and question the theoretical and empirical gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature. |
|||||
4 | To be able to identify the political and cultural conditions that generate discrimination mechanisms based on race, ethnicity, gender and religion at national and international levels. |
|||||
5 | To be able to gather and analyze data by using scientific research methods. |
X | ||||
6 | To be able to analyze and evaluate the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics. |
X | ||||
7 | To be able to present individual research and contemporary developments in Political Science and International Relations in written, oral, and visual forms. |
|||||
8 | To be able to take responsibility in generating solutions to the problems that arise in relation to the politics in daily life. |
|||||
9 | To be able to determine the institutional and political instruments for conflict resolution in domestic and international politics. |
X | ||||
10 | To be able to prepare a thesis/term project about Political Science and International Relations based on scientific criteria. |
|||||
11 | To be able to follow new research and developments in Political Science and International Relations and participate the debates in academic meetings through a foreign language. |
|||||
12 | To be able to have ethical, social and scientific values in the stages throughout the processes of gathering, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data relevant to Political Science and International Relations. |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest