Course Name |
Comparative Politics
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
PSIR 503
|
Fall
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Required
|
|||||
Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionCritical feedbackLecture / Presentation | |||||
National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) |
Course Objectives | This course introduces the major theoretical and methodological debates in comparative politics as well as the particular areas of research in the subfield. The objectives of this course include understanding the major concepts, debates, and approaches in comparative politics. Topics include the formation of nations and states, democracy, autocracy, party systems, electoral systems, executive and legislative institutions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Learning Outcomes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course Description | This course broadly covers the comparison of state institutions and political systems across countries. During the course the students are expected to read the assigned material and actively participate in class discussions. The general format of the course comprises lectures, class discussions of the assigned readings, and examinations. Attendance is required at all times. Some percentage of your final grade will be based on your attendance and class participation. |
|
Core Courses |
X
|
Major Area Courses | ||
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation | Learning Outcome |
1 | Introduction | Presentation and an overview of the course | |
2 | What is comparative politics? | Caramani, Chaps 1- 3; Wilson, Matthew. 2017. “Trends in Political Science Research and the Progress of Comparative Politics,” PS: Political Science and Politics 50(4): 979-8; Mahoney, James, 2010. “After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research,” World Politics 62(1): 120-47. | |
3 | Origins of State and Nation | Caramani, Ch.4; Taylor, B.D. and Botea, R. 2008. Tilly Tally: War-making and State-making in the Contemporary Third World. International Studies Review 10(1): 27-56; Spruyt, Hendrik. 2011. “War, Trade and State Formation,” in Robert Goodin (ed) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics; Mylonas, Harris and Maya Tudor. 2021. “Nationalism: What We Know and What We Still Need to Know.” Annual Review of Political Science, 24:1, 109-132. | |
4 | Regime types: Democratization and Democracy | Caramani, Ch.5 Geddes, Barbara. 1999. ‘What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?’ Annual Review of Political Science, 2:115‐44; Collier, David and Steven Levitsky. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Politics 49(3): 430-51; Ziblatt, Daniel. 2006. "How Did Europe Democratize?" World Politics 58: 311–38. | |
5 | Autocracy and Democratic Backsliding | Caramani, Ch.6 Diamond, Larry. 2002. ‘Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.’ Journal of Democracy 13: 21‐35. Gandhi, Jennifer and Adam Przeworski. 2007. "Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats." Comparative Political Studies 40(11): 1279-1301. ; Waldner, David and Ellen Lust. 2018. "Unwelcome change: Coming to terms with democratic backsliding." Annual Review of Political Science 21: 93-113. | |
6 | Electoral systems | Caramani, Ch.10 Boix, Carles. 1999. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93 (3 Sep.): 609-624; Horowitz, Donald. 2003. "Electoral systems: A primer for decision makers." Journal of Democracy 14(4): 115-127. | |
7 | Midterm Exam | - | |
8 | Political parties and party systems | Caramani, Ch. 12-13 Urbinati, Nadia and Mark Warren. 2008. "The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory." Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 387-412. | |
9 | Legislative and Executive Institutions | Caramani, Ch.7&8 Blais, André, Louis Massicotte and Agnieszka Dobrynska. 1997. ‘Direct presidential elections: A world summary.’ Electoral Studies 16(4): 441‐455. Linz, Juan. 1990. ‘The Perils of Presidentialism.’ Journal of Democracy 1(1): 51‐69. | |
10 | Political Violence | Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97(1): 75-90; Fujii, Lee Ann. 2013. “The Puzzle of Extra-Lethal Violence.” Perspectives on Politics 11(2): 410-426; Muller, Edward N., and Erich Weede. 1990. “Cross- National Variation in Political Violence: A Rational Action Approach.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 34(4): 624-651. | |
11 | Social Movements | Caramani, Ch.16 Tarrow, Sidney, and Charles Tilly. 2007. “Contentious Politics and Social Movements.” In Carles Boix and Susan Stokes, eds., Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. | |
12 | Economy and welfare state | Caramani, Ch. 21. Burkhart, Ross E. 1997. ‘Comparative Democracy and Income Distribution: Shape and Direction of the Causal Arrow.’ Journal of Politics 59(1): 148‐164; Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48, 2: 143-79. (37) | |
13 | Student Presentations | ||
14 | Student Presentations | ||
15 | Review of the Semester | ||
16 | Final Exam |
Course Notes/Textbooks | Course textbook is Daniele Caramani. 2008. Comparative Politics. (5th edition) Oxford: Oxford University Press. All course readings are available at the University Library and as open sources. |
Suggested Readings/Materials | Moore, Barrington, Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press. Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press. Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak. New Haven: Yale University Press. Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1989 [1963]. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Gellner, Ernest. 2009 [1983]. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty‐Seven Democracies, 1945‐1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Linz, Juan. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. State‐Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Cornell University Press. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2005. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tarrow, Sidney. 2008. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Lichbach, Mark Irving, and Alan S. Zuckerman. 2009. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure (2nd Edition). Cambridge University Press. Bates, Robert H. 2009. When Things Fall Apart: State Failure in Late Century Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. WIMMER, Andreas. 2013. Waves of War: Nationalism, State Formation, and Ethnic Exclusion in the Modern World. Cambridge University Press. WIMMER, Andreas. 2018. Nation Building: Why Some Countries Come Together While Others Fall Apart. Princeton University Press. ACADEMIC HONESTY: Honesty and trust are the most fundamental pillars of learning and are necessary foundation for success and academic freedom in a university. Hence, any behavior that jeopardizes the learning environment by violating the rules of academic honesty will not be tolerated or condoned: Violations of academic honesty include but are not limited to: Cheating or facilitating cheating • looking or attempting to look at another student's answers or allowing others to copy one's answers, • copying other student’s in-class or take-home exam answers or letting others use take-home exam answers, • using "cheat sheet," pre-programmed calculator if not allowed by the instructor, • having someone else prepare the term project or homework or letting others use one’s homework/term project/paper, • Assistance of another person in preparation of a tem paper/homework/project if not allowed by the instructor, • Taking an exam for another student, • Purchasing term projects or homework or other assignments, • Signing in place of another student using their name/signature/student id number, Plagiarism • showing the work of another as one's own, • Not properly citing an earlier own work, • Submitting the same homework/paper/term project in one more one course if not allowed by the instructor, • Inaccurately or inadequately citing sources including those from the Internet, Violations of academic honesty can result in disciplinary action, as stated in the "Student Disciplinary Rules and Regulation" of the University. http://www.ieu.edu.tr/en/bylaws/type/read/id/13 and http://kariyer.ieu.edu.tr/en/bylaws/type/read/id/81 By enrolling in the University, each student is assumed to have read the rules and regulations regarding academic dishonesty, and lack of knowledge of this policy is not an acceptable defense. |
Semester Activities | Number | Weighting | LO 1 | LO 2 | LO 3 | LO 4 | LO 5 |
Participation |
1
|
20
|
|||||
Laboratory / Application |
-
|
-
|
|||||
Field Work | |||||||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||||||
Portfolio | |||||||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
20
|
|||||
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
10
|
|||||
Project | |||||||
Seminar / Workshop | |||||||
Oral Exams | |||||||
Midterm |
1
|
20
|
|||||
Final Exam |
1
|
30
|
|||||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
4
|
70
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
30
|
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
15
|
5
|
75
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
25
|
25
|
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
5
|
5
|
Project |
0
|
||
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
1
|
35
|
35
|
Final Exam |
1
|
37
|
37
|
Total |
225
|
#
|
PC Sub | Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
1 |
To be able to improve theoretical and conceptual proficiencies on Political Science and International Relations and use them competently. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
2 |
To be able to evaluate critically the relationships between various factors in the field of Political Science and International Relations such as structures, actors, institutions and culture. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
3 |
To be able to determine and question the theoretical and empirical gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
4 |
To be able to identify the political and cultural conditions that generate discrimination mechanisms based on race, ethnicity, gender and religion at national and international levels. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
5 |
To be able to gather and analyze data by using scientific research methods. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
6 |
To be able to analyze and evaluate the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
7 |
To be able to present individual research and contemporary developments in Political Science and International Relations in written, oral, and visual forms. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
8 |
To be able to take responsibility in generating solutions to the problems that arise in relation to the politics in daily life. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
9 |
To be able to determine the institutional and political instruments for conflict resolution in domestic and international politics. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
10 |
To be able to prepare a thesis/term project about Political Science and International Relations based on scientific criteria. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
11 |
To be able to follow new research and developments in Political Science and International Relations and participate the debates in academic meetings through a foreign language. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
12 |
To be able to have ethical, social and scientific values in the stages throughout the processes of gathering, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data relevant to Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..