İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi
  • TÜRKÇE

  • GRADUATE SCHOOL

    Political Science and International Relations (With Thesis)

    PSIR 504 | Course Introduction and Application Information

    Course Name
    Contemporary Debates in Global Politics
    Code
    Semester
    Theory
    (hour/week)
    Application/Lab
    (hour/week)
    Local Credits
    ECTS
    PSIR 504
    Fall/Spring
    3
    0
    3
    7.5

    Prerequisites
    None
    Course Language
    English
    Course Type
    Elective
    Course Level
    Second Cycle
    Mode of Delivery -
    Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course -
    National Occupation Classification -
    Course Coordinator
    Course Lecturer(s)
    Assistant(s)
    Course Objectives This seminar course is designed to introduce graduate students to debates in global politics.
    Learning Outcomes
    #
    Content
    PC Sub
    * Contribution Level
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    1to assess trends and problems in global politics from a theoretical point of view
    2to critically evaluate contemporary debates about global politics
    3to assess contemporary contributions to academic literature in the field of political theory
    4to participate in group work through seminar presentations and class discussion
    5to apply political theory to contemporary public debates
    Course Description This course aims to explore key debates and a wide range of topics in global politics. Among the themes to be investigated are the question of revolution in politics, the political theory of civil disobedience, the concept of state sovereignty, conceptions of genocide, theories of cosmopolitanism, secularism, and political ecology.

     



    Course Category

    Core Courses
    Major Area Courses
    X
    Supportive Courses
    Media and Management Skills Courses
    Transferable Skill Courses

     

    WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES

    Week Subjects Related Preparation Learning Outcome
    1 Introduction
    2 Tocqueville on the theory and practice of French Revolution Tocqueville, The Ancien Régime and the French Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 1-27; 76-124.
    3 Tocqueville on the theory and practice of French Revolution Tocqueville, The Ancien Régime and the French Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 127-185.
    4 Arendt on Revolution I: Constitutio Libertatis Arendt, On Revolution, (Penguin Books, 1963), 141-178, 179-214.
    5 Arendt on Revolution II: The Revolutionary Tradition and Its Lost Treasure Arendt, On Revolution, (Penguin Books, 1963), 215-281.
    6 Paper Submission I TAKE-HOME
    7 The Meaning and Justification of Civil Disobedience: Thoreau and Rawls 1. Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience”, in Hugo Adam Bodau, Civil Disobedience in Focus (Routledge, 1991), 28-48. 2. John Rawls, “Definiton and Justification of Civil Disobedience”, in Hugo Adam Bodau, Civil Disobedience in Focus (Routledge, 1991), 103-121.
    8 Civil Disobedience as Public Freedom: Hannah Arendt “Civil Disobedience” Crises of the Republic (Harcourt & Brace, 1969), 49-102.
    9 State Sovereignty: Carl Schmitt Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political (The University of Chicago Press, 1996), 19-79.
    10 Genocide as a Crime Against Humanity: Raphael Lemkin 1. Raphael Lemkin, “Genocide” Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (The Lawbook Exchange, 2008), 79-95. 2. William Schabas and Samantha Power, “Introduction to the First and Second Editions” Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (The Lawbook Exchange, 2008), vii-xxiii. 3. Seyla Benhabib, “International Law and Human Plurality in the Shadow of Totalitarianism: Hannah Arendt and Raphael Lemkin” Seyla Benhabib (ed), Politics in Dark Times (Cambridge University Press, 2010), 219-246. 4. The United Nation’s Genocide Convention, 1948.
    11 Cosmopolitanism Seyla Benhabib, Another Cosmopolitanism (Oxford University Press, 2006), 13-80.
    12 Secularism and Constitutional Democracy 1. Jürgen Habermas, “Pre-political Foundations of the Democratic Constitutional State” The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion (Ignatius Press, 2006), 19-52. 2. Jürgen Habermas, “What is meant by a ‘Post-Secular Society’?: A Discussion on Islam in Europe” Europe: The Faltering Project (Polity, 2009), 59-77.
    13 Political Ecology 1) Jane Bennett “Political Ecologies”, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Duke University Press, 2010), 94-109. 2) Christophe Bonneuil and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, The Shock of the Anthroposcene (Verso, 2016), 1-30.
    14 Documentary Film & Discussion Documentary: The Watchers of the Sky
    15 Paper Submission II and Review of the Semester
    16 Final Exam

     

    Course Notes/Textbooks

    All course readings are available at the University Library and as open sources.

    Suggested Readings/Materials

     

    EVALUATION SYSTEM

    Semester Activities Number Weighting LO 1 LO 2 LO 3 LO 4 LO 5
    Participation
    1
    20
    Laboratory / Application
    Field Work
    Quizzes / Studio Critiques
    Portfolio
    Homework / Assignments
    2
    30
    Presentation / Jury
    2
    30
    Project
    Seminar / Workshop
    Oral Exams
    Midterm
    Final Exam
    1
    20
    Total

    Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade
    4
    70
    Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade
    1
    30
    Total

    ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE

    Semester Activities Number Duration (Hours) Workload
    Theoretical Course Hours
    (Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
    16
    3
    48
    Laboratory / Application Hours
    (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours)
    16
    0
    Study Hours Out of Class
    12
    8
    96
    Field Work
    0
    Quizzes / Studio Critiques
    0
    Portfolio
    0
    Homework / Assignments
    2
    15
    30
    Presentation / Jury
    2
    15
    30
    Project
    0
    Seminar / Workshop
    0
    Oral Exam
    0
    Midterms
    0
    Final Exam
    1
    21
    21
        Total
    225

     

    COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP

    #
    PC Sub Program Competencies/Outcomes
    * Contribution Level
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    1

    To be able to improve theoretical and conceptual proficiencies on Political Science and International Relations and use them competently.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    X
    2

    To be able to evaluate critically the relationships between various factors in the field of Political Science and International Relations such as structures, actors, institutions and culture.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    3

    To be able to determine and question the theoretical and empirical gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature.

    -
    -
    X
    -
    -
    4

    To be able to identify the political and cultural conditions that generate discrimination mechanisms based on race, ethnicity, gender and religion at national and international levels.

    -
    X
    -
    -
    -
    5

    To be able to gather and analyze data by using scientific research methods.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    6

    To be able to analyze and evaluate the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics.

    -
    X
    -
    -
    -
    7

    To be able to present individual research and contemporary developments in Political Science and International Relations in written, oral, and visual forms.

    -
    X
    -
    -
    -
    8

    To be able to take responsibility in generating solutions to the problems that arise in relation to the politics in daily life.

    X
    -
    -
    -
    -
    9

    To be able to determine the institutional and political instruments for conflict resolution in domestic and international politics.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    -
    10

    To be able to prepare a thesis/term project about Political Science and International Relations based on scientific criteria.

    X
    -
    -
    -
    -
    11

    To be able to follow new research and developments in Political Science and International Relations and participate the debates in academic meetings through a foreign language.

    X
    -
    -
    -
    -
    12

    To be able to have ethical, social and scientific values in the stages throughout the processes of gathering, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data relevant to Political Science and International Relations.

    X
    -
    -
    -
    -

    *1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest

     


    Success Stories of Izmir University of Economics Students

    Sami Eyidilli
    Department of Business Administration
    Academic Career
    Merve Akça
    Psychology
    International Career
    Aslı Nur TİMUR YORDANOV
    CIU Lead Sustainable Energy Architect
    Professional
    Alper GÜLER
    Qreal 3D Technologies
    Entrepreneur

    NEW GÜZELBAHÇE CAMPUS

    Details

    GLOBAL CAREER

    As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.

    More..

    CONTRIBUTION TO SCIENCE

    Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.

    More..

    VALUING PEOPLE

    Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.

    More..

    BENEFIT TO SOCIETY

    Transferring 22 years of power and experience to social work…

    More..
    You are one step ahead with your graduate education at Izmir University of Economics.