Course Name |
Seminar in Turkish Politics
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
PSIR 551
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | This course aims to discuss the Turkish political institutions like bureaucracy, military, political parties, governments, and parliaments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Learning Outcomes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course Description | Topics to be covered include political culture, civil society, political leaders, and tribulations of democracy in Turkey. |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation | Learning Outcome |
1 | Introduction and review of syllabus | ||
2 | Introduction to Turkish Politics | Ergun Özbudun, “Development of Democratic Government in Turkey,” in Ergun Özbudun (ed.), Perspectives on Democracy in Turkey, (Ankara: Turkish Political Science Association Publication, 1988): 1-58. | |
3 | Military and Politics | George Harris, "The Role of the Military in Turkey in the 1980s: Guardians or Decision-Makers?" in M. Heper and A. Evin (eds.) State, Democracy and the Military in Turkey in the 1980s, (Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1988): 177 - 200. Zeki Sarigil, Public Opinion and Attitude toward the Military and Democratic Consolidation in Turkey, Armed Forces & Society 2015, Vol. 41(2) 282-306, 2013. | |
4 | Political Culture | Şerif Mardin, “Opposition and Control in Turkey,” Government and Opposition, May 1966, Vol. 1, No. 3 (May 1966). İlter Turan, "The Evolution of Political Culture in Turkey," in Ahmet Evin, Modern Turkey: Continuity and Change, pp. 84-112. | |
5 | Political Parties and Party System | Güneş Murat Tezcür, “Trends and Characteristics of the Turkish Party System in Light of the 2011 Elections,” Turkish Studies, 13:2, 117-134, 2012. Pelin Ayan Musil, “Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey,” South European Society and Politics, 20:1, 71-92, 2015. | |
6 | Elections and Voting Behavior | Ersin Kalaycioglu, “Turkish party system: leaders, vote and institutionalization,” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 13:4, 483-502, 2013. | |
7 | Midterm Exam | ||
8 | Secularism | Andrew Davison, “Turkey, a "Secular" State?: The Challenge of Description,” The South Atlantic Quarterly, Vol. 102, No. 2/3, Spring/Summer 2003, pp. 333-350 | |
9 | Religion and Politics | Ziya Öniş, “Conservative Globalism at the Crossroads: The Justice and Development Party and the Thorny Path to Democratic Consolidation in Turkey,” Mediterranean Politics, Vol.14, No.1 (2009), p.32. | |
10 | Civil Society | Metin Heper & Senem Yıldırım (2011) Revisiting civil society in Turkey, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11:1, 1-18. | |
11 | Media | M. Akser & Baybars-Hawks, B. (2012). Media and Democracy in Turkey: Toward a Model of Neoliberal Media Autocracy. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 5(3), 302–321. | |
12 | Student presentations | ||
13 | Student presentations | ||
14 | Student presentations | ||
15 | Review of the semester | ||
16 | Final Examination |
Course Notes/Textbooks | All course readings are available at the University Library and as open sources. |
Suggested Readings/Materials | • Bernard Lewis, The Emergence of Modern Turkey (London: Oxford University Press, 1961). • Stanford J. and Ezel Kural Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, Volume 2: Reform, Revolution and Republic: The Rise of Modern Turkey, 1908–1975 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977). • Feroz Ahmad, The Making of Modern Turkey (London and New York: Routledge, 1993). • Geoffrey Lewis, Modern Turkey (London and Tonbridge: Ernest Benn, 1974). • Roderic Davison, Turkey: A Short History, 2nd edn (Huntingdon: Eothen, 1988). Niyazi Berkes, The Development of Secularism in Turkey (Montreal: McGill University Press, 1964). • Çağlar Keyder, State and Class in Turkey: A Study in Capitalist Development (London: Verso, 1987). • Tanzimat'tan Cumhuriyet'e Türkiye Ansiklopedisi, 6 volumes (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1986). • Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi, 10 volumes (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1983). • Sina Akşin, editor, Türkiye Tarihi, Volumes 4–5: Çağdaş Türkiye, 1908–1980, and Bugünkü Türkiye, 1980–2003 (İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi, 1989–2003). • Ergun Özbudun, Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2000). • Ersin Kalaycıoğlu, Turkish Dynamics: Bridge Across Troubled Lands (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). • Sina Akşin, Turkey from Empire to Revolutionary Republic: The Emergence of the Turkish Nation from 1789 to the Present (New York: New York University Press, 2007). • Modern Türkiye'de Siyasî Düşünce, 8 volumes (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2001–2007) |
Semester Activities | Number | Weighting | LO 1 | LO 2 | LO 3 | LO 4 | LO 5 | LO 6 |
Participation |
1
|
20
|
||||||
Laboratory / Application | ||||||||
Field Work | ||||||||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||||||||
Portfolio | ||||||||
Homework / Assignments | ||||||||
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
20
|
||||||
Project | ||||||||
Seminar / Workshop | ||||||||
Oral Exams | ||||||||
Midterm |
1
|
30
|
||||||
Final Exam |
1
|
30
|
||||||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
70
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
30
|
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
5
|
70
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
38
|
38
|
Project |
0
|
||
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
1
|
33
|
33
|
Final Exam |
1
|
36
|
36
|
Total |
225
|
#
|
PC Sub | Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
1 |
To be able to improve theoretical and conceptual proficiencies on Political Science and International Relations and use them competently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
2 |
To be able to evaluate critically the relationships between various factors in the field of Political Science and International Relations such as structures, actors, institutions and culture. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
3 |
To be able to determine and question the theoretical and empirical gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
4 |
To be able to identify the political and cultural conditions that generate discrimination mechanisms based on race, ethnicity, gender and religion at national and international levels. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
5 |
To be able to gather and analyze data by using scientific research methods. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
6 |
To be able to analyze and evaluate the historical continuity and changes observed in the relations between the actors and institutions of national and international politics. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
7 |
To be able to present individual research and contemporary developments in Political Science and International Relations in written, oral, and visual forms. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
8 |
To be able to take responsibility in generating solutions to the problems that arise in relation to the politics in daily life. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
9 |
To be able to determine the institutional and political instruments for conflict resolution in domestic and international politics. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
10 |
To be able to prepare a thesis/term project about Political Science and International Relations based on scientific criteria. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
11 |
To be able to follow new research and developments in Political Science and International Relations and participate the debates in academic meetings through a foreign language. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
12 |
To be able to have ethical, social and scientific values in the stages throughout the processes of gathering, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data relevant to Political Science and International Relations. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..