GRADUATE SCHOOL
PhD in Political Science and International Relations
PSIR 666 | Course Introduction and Application Information
| Course Name |
The Legitimacy of EU Governance
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
PSIR 666
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
Third Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | - | |||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | The aim of this course is to analyze the scientific debate about the legitimacy deficits of EU governance. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The seminars examine the three dimensions of legitimacy: 1) Input-legitimacy refers to the popular authorization and accountability of governance. 2) Output-legitimacy results from the performance of a political system. 3) Social legitimacy implies a common political identity as precondition of majoritarian democracy. Students get familiarized with the transformation of concepts of political legitimacy in recent scientific debates: How can post-national governance be legitimized? Is the parliamentary democracy of the nation state transferable to supranational governance? Which role does NGO play in EU governance? Is there a European identity? The seminars further deal with the reform of the institutional architecture of the EU, its gradual parliamentarisation and performance analysis of EU governance. |
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction | |
| 2 | Indicators of the EU’s legitimacy problems | |
| 3 | Sources of legitimacy | |
| 4 | Social legitimacy and Enlargement | |
| 5 | Procedural legitimacy: Empowerment of the EP | |
| 6 | Procedural legitimacy: Reform of the Council | |
| 7 | Procedural legitimacy: Stakeholder Participation | |
| 8 | Output legitimacy: The transformation of macroeconomic and fiscal governance after the Euro crisis | |
| 9 | Output legitimacy: Employment and Social Welfare | |
| 10 | Output legitimacy: Climate Change and Energy | |
| 11 | Output legitimacy: Normative Power Europe | |
| 12 | Output legitimacy: Transformaive Power of the EU in candidate countries | |
| 13 | Presentations | |
| 14 | Exam | |
| 15 | Review of the Semester | |
| 16 | Review of the Semester |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Reading Material and power point presentations. All course readings are available at the University Library and as open sources. |
| Suggested Readings/Materials |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation | ||
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments |
1
|
10
|
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
20
|
| Project |
2
|
40
|
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
1
|
30
|
| Final Exam | ||
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
5
|
100
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
| Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
14
|
3
|
42
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
1
|
20
|
20
|
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
30
|
30
|
| Project |
2
|
25
|
50
|
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
1
|
35
|
35
|
| Final Exam |
0
|
||
| Total |
225
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
| 1 | To be able to improve and deepen the theoretical and conceptual proficiencies on Political Science and International Relations. |
X | ||||
| 2 | To be able to evaluate critically and analytically the relationships between various factors in the discipline of Political Science and International Relations such as structures, actors, institutions and culture at an advanced level. |
X | ||||
| 3 | To be able to determine the theoretical and empirical gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature and gain the ability of questioning at an advanced level. |
X | ||||
| 4 | To be able to gain the ability to develop innovative, leading and original arguments in order to fill the gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature. |
X | ||||
| 5 | To be able to gather, analyze, and interpret the data by using advanced qualitative or quantitative research methods in Political Science and International Relations. |
|||||
| 6 | To be able to develop original academic works and publish scientific articles in refereed national or international indexed journals in the field of Political Science and International Relations. |
|||||
| 7 | To be able to describe individual research and contemporary developments in Political Science and International Relations in written, oral, and visual forms. |
X | ||||
| 8 | To be able to take responsibility in an individual capacity and/or as part of a team in generating innovative and analytical solutions to the problems that arise in relation to the politics in daily life. |
|||||
| 9 | To be able to develop projects in determining the institutional and political instruments for conflict resolution in national and international politics. |
|||||
| 10 | To be able to prepare an original thesis in Political Science and International Relations based on scientific criteria. |
|||||
| 11 | To be able to follow new research and developments, publish scientific articles and participate the debates in academic meetings in Political Science and International Relations through a foreign language. |
|||||
| 12 | To be able to have ethical, social and scientific values in the stages throughout the processes of gathering, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data relevant to Political Science and International Relations. |
X | ||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest