GRADUATE SCHOOL

Political Science and International Relations (Without thesis)

PSIR 502 | Course Introduction and Application Information

Course Name
Theories of International Relations
Code
Semester
Theory
(hour/week)
Application/Lab
(hour/week)
Local Credits
ECTS
PSIR 502
Spring
3
0
3
7.5

Prerequisites
None
Course Language
English
Course Type
Required
Course Level
Second Cycle
Mode of Delivery -
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course -
Course Coordinator -
Course Lecturer(s)
Assistant(s)
Course Objectives This course will help the students to both develop their critical thinking on main themes of IR such as conflict, security, power, self-determination, integration and globalization from different theoretical perspectives and apply various mainstream and critical theories of International Relations to real-world cases.
Learning Outcomes The students who succeeded in this course;
  • Can discuss the goal and importance of theory and theoretical researches.
  • Can explain the main assumptions, problematics, epistemological, ontological and methodological foundations and their solutions of those problematics with examples.
  • Can compare different theories in regard to the issues mentioned in article two.
  • Can analyze historical and contemporary events and problems by using theories of international relations
  • Can comment on the future of international relations and emerging trends in the framework of discussed theoretical approaches.
Course Description This graduate seminar surveys the main theoretical and analytical approaches encountered in the study of international relations.

 



Course Category

Core Courses
X
Major Area Courses
Supportive Courses
Media and Management Skills Courses
Transferable Skill Courses

 

WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES

Week Subjects Related Preparation
1 Introduction
2 What is IR Theory and why do we need it? Smith, S. (2016). "Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory", in Dunne et al. (Eds.), International Relations Theories, Ch. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, S. (1995). "The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory", in K. Booth & S. Smith (Eds.)., International Relations Theory Today (pp.1-19), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Singer, J. D. (1961). “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations,” World Politics, 14 (1), pp. 77-92.
3 Classical and Structural Realism Carr, E.H. (2000). The Twenty Years’ Crisis. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Ch. 1-6. Morgenthau, H. J. (1945) “The Evil of Politics and the Ethics of Evil’, Ethics, 56 (1), pp. 1-18. Guzzini, S. (2004), “The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism”, European Journal of International Relations, 10 (4), pp. 533-568. Waltz, K. N. (1990), “Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory”, Journal of International Affairs, 44 (1), pp. 21-37.
4 Liberalism(s) Wilson, P. (2003). “What is Idealism?” in The International Theory of Leonard Woolf: A Study in Twentieth-Century Idealism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, Ch. 2. Keohane, R. (2004), http://www.uctv.tv/shows/Theory-and-International-Institutions-with-Robert-O-Keohane-Conversations-with-History-8991 Doyle, M. (1983). "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part I," Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12 (3), pp. 205-235. Owen, J. (1994). "How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace," International Security, 19 (2), pp. 87-125. Oneal, J., Russett, B., & Berbaum, M. (2003). “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992”. International Studies Quarterly, 47 (3), 371-393.
5 Constructivism Wendt, A. (1992). “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics,” International Organization, 46 (2), pp. 391‐425. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 92‐192 Hurd, I. (1999). “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,” International Organization, 53 (2), pp. 379‐408.
6 Marxism and Critical Theory Linklater, A. (2005). “Marxism” in Burchill, S. (Ed.), Theories of International Relations. London: Palgrave, Ch. 5. Linklater, A. (1986). “Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory.” Review of International Studies, 12 (4), pp. 301–312. Cox, R. W. (1983). “Gramsci, Hegemony and IR”, Millennium, 12 (2), pp. 162-175.
7 Midterm
8 The English School Buzan, B. (2001). "The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR", Review of International Studies, 27 (3), pp. 471-88. Bull, H. (1971). “Order vs. Justice in International Society”, Political Studies, 19 (3), pp. 269-83.
9 Poststructuralism Foucault, M. (1980) “Truth and Power”. in Gordon. C. (Ed.). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 109-133. Der Derian, J. (2000). ‘Virtuous War / Virtual Theory,’ International Affairs, 76 (4), pp. 771-788. Dillon, M. and Guerrero, L. L. (2008). “Biopolitics of Security in the 21st Century: an Introduction”, Review of International Studies, 34 (2), pp. 265-292.
10 Postcolonialism Said, E. (2003) Orientalism, London: Penguin, pp. 1-49. Darby, P., & Paolini, A. J. (1994). “Bridging International Relations and Postcolonialism”. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 19 (3), 371–397. Seth, S. (2011). “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations”. Millennium, 40 (1), pp. 167-183.
11 New Approaches in IR and the Transforming Definition of Security Tickner, A. (1997). “You just don’t understand: troubled engagements between feminist and IR theorists”, International Studies Quarterly, 41 (4), pp. 611-632. Kinnvall, C. (2004). “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security”. Political Psychology, 25 (5), pp. 741-767. Rumelili, B. & Adisonmez, U. C. (2020). “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Kimlik-Güvenlik İlişkisine Dair Yeni bir Paradigma: Ontolojik Güvenlik Teorisi” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 17 (66), pp. 23-39. Lukes, S. (2005). “Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds”, Millennium, 33 (3), pp. 477-493. Buzan, B. (1984). “Peace, Power, and Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations”. Journal of Peace Research, 21 (2), pp. 109-125. Stein, J. G. (2013). “Threat perception in international relations”. in L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 364–394. Adisonmez, U. C. (2016). “What is the Human Security Approach and How the Phenomenon Contributed to the International Security Agenda: Canadian and Japanese Paradigms”. Security Strategies Journal, 12 (24), pp. 1-28.
12 Project Presentations
13 Project Presentations
14 Project Presentations
15 General overview of the course
16 Final Exam

 

Course Notes/Textbooks

No particular course book, but students are advised to acquire the below book in order to track the weekly discussions:

Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki ve Steve Smith (Eds.) (2016). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

*All course readings are available at the University Library and as open sources.

Suggested Readings/Materials

Moran M. Mandelbaum (2019). The Nation/State Fantasy: From Gellner to Lacan. Palgrace Macmillan.

Brent Steele (2008) Ontological Security in Intrernational Relations: Self-Identitiy and the IR State. Routledge.

 

EVALUATION SYSTEM

Semester Activities Number Weigthing
Participation
1
20
Laboratory / Application
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
Presentation / Jury
1
20
Project
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exams
Midterm
1
20
Final Exam
1
40
Total

Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade
3
60
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade
1
40
Total

ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE

Semester Activities Number Duration (Hours) Workload
Theoretical Course Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
3
48
Laboratory / Application Hours
(Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours)
16
0
Study Hours Out of Class
16
7
112
Field Work
0
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
0
Portfolio
0
Homework / Assignments
0
Presentation / Jury
1
15
15
Project
0
Seminar / Workshop
0
Oral Exam
0
Midterms
1
20
20
Final Exam
1
30
30
    Total
225

 

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP

#
Program Competencies/Outcomes
* Contribution Level
1
2
3
4
5
1 To improve theoretical and conceptual proficiencies on Political Science and International Relations and to ultimately deepen and develop intellectual interest X
2 To evaluate the relationships between factors in the field of Political Science and International Relations such as structures, actors, institutions and culture in a critical perspective X
3 To provide advanced competences to determine and question the theoretical and emprical gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature X
4 To identify the political and cultual conditions that generate discrimination mechanisms based on race, ethnic groups, gender and religion at national and international levels X
5 To provide competences to develop original arguments in order to fill the gaps in Political Science and International Relations literature X
6 To determine, collect, resolve, and interpret the data that would measure the theories and concepts as variables by using scientific research methods in Political Science and International Relations field X
7 To use confidently the terms and concepts of Political Science and International Relations X
8 To communicate systematically, in written, oral, and visual forms, contemporary developments in Political Science and International Relations to groups inside and outside the said discipline X
9 To take responsibility in an individual capacity and as part of a team in generating solutions to unexpected problems that arise in relation to politics in daily life X
10 To develop projects determining the institutional and political instruments for management of domestic and international conflicts X
11 To prepare an orginal thesis/term project about Political Science and International Relations in accordance with scentific criteria X
12 To design and carry out a scientific research project in the field of Political Science and International Relations X
13 To have ethical, social and scientific values in the stages throughout the processes of collecting, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data relevant to Political Science and International Relations X

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest

 


Izmir University of Economics
is an establishment of
izto logo
Izmir Chamber of Commerce Health and Education Foundation.
ieu logo

Sakarya Street No:156
35330 Balçova - İzmir / Turkey

kampus izmir

Follow Us

İEU © All rights reserved.