GRADUATE SCHOOL

M.SC. In Architecture (With Thesis)

ARCH 501 | Course Introduction and Application Information

Course Name
Theory and Criticism in Architecture I
Code
Semester
Theory
(hour/week)
Application/Lab
(hour/week)
Local Credits
ECTS
ARCH 501
Fall
3
0
3
7.5

Prerequisites
None
Course Language
English
Course Type
Required
Course Level
Second Cycle
Mode of Delivery -
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course Discussion
Case Study
Q&A
Critical feedback
Lecture / Presentation
Course Coordinator -
Course Lecturer(s)
Assistant(s) -
Course Objectives To develop the students’ critical interpretive skills in architecture by introducing them to architectural and historical texts and their critical interpretations by leading contemporary theorists including philosophers and cultural theorists as well as architects and historians.
Learning Outcomes The students who succeeded in this course;
  • Will be able to discuss theoretical debates in architecture in the 20th century
  • Will be able to approach the architectural discipline from contemporary theoretical perspectives.
  • Will be able to conduct advanced architectural criticism at an interdisciplinary level.
  • Will be able to understand interdisciplinary academic research.
  • Will be able to raise ethical issues in architecture.
  • Will be able to apply academic writing skills at an interdisciplinary level.
Course Description This course focuses on historically recurrent architectural themes from contemporary theoretical perspectives.

 



Course Category

Core Courses
Major Area Courses
X
Supportive Courses
Media and Management Skills Courses
Transferable Skill Courses

 

WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES

Week Subjects Related Preparation
1 Introduction of Course Topics - Theory and Architecture
2 Academic Research and Article Writing
3 Modernism: Theory • Architectural Design and Representation in Modernism Selected readings from Mallgrave, H. F., & Contandriopoulos, C. (2008). Architectural theory, volume II: An anthology from 1871–2005. Maldwell, MA: Blackwell Publishing. /Quiz 1
4 Construction and material technologies in modernist architecture • Urban and environmental context in modernism Thomas L. Schumacher (2005) Horizontality, Journal of Architectural Education, 59:1, 17-26, DOI: 10.1111/ j.1531-314X.2005.00002.x and Eloísa Petti Pinheiro (2012) New urban forms: the crescents of Bath and Le Corbusier's plan for Rio de Janeiro, Planning Perspectives, 27:1, 121-129, DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2012.629820 / /Quiz 2
5 Assignment Submission: My Modernist Mentor Homework Submission/ Presentation
6 Structuralism: Theory • Architectural Design and Representation in Structuralism; Construction and material technologies in structuralist architecture • Urban and environmental context in structuralism Söderqvist, L. (2011). Structuralism in architecture: A definition, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 3(1), 5414. https://doi. org/10.3402/jac.v3i0.5414/Quiz 3
7 Postmodernism: Theory • Architectural Design and Representation in Postmodernism Jencks, C. (2011) The Story of Post-Modernism: Five Decades of the Ironic, Iconic and Critical in Architecture 1st Edition Wiley, 19-47 /Quiz 4
8 Construction and material technologies in postmodernist architecture • Urban and environmental context in postmodernism Venturi, Robert; Scott Brown, Denise, and Izenour, Steven (1977). Learning from Las Vegas. MIT Press 1-47/Quiz 5
9 Semiotics and Phenomenology in Architecture Mallgrave, H. F., & Contandriopoulos, C. (2008). Architectural theory, volume II: An anthology from 1871–2005. Maldwell, MA: Blackwell Publishing seçilmiş Okumalar / Quiz 6
10 Assignment Submission: Challenging Post-Modernism or Embracing it? Homework Submission/ Presentation
11 Post-Structuralism and Deconstructivism: Theory • Architectural Design and Representation in Post-Structuralism/ Deconstructivism; Construction and material technologies in poststructuralist/ deconstructivist architecture. • Urban and environmental context in poststructuralism/ deconstructivism Mary McLeod (1989) “Architecture and Politics in the Reagan Era: From Postmodernism to Deconstructivism,” Assemblage 8 / Quiz 7
12 Assignment Submission: My Deconstructivist Mentor Homework Submission/ Presentation
13 Architectural Criticism- The foundations Coyne, Dr. R. (2020) “The Production of Architectural Criticism” Architectural Theory Review 16(2) /Quiz 8
14 Architectural Criticism and Contemporary Architecture Case Studies from World Cities
15 Assignment Submission: Critique of Iconic Architecture Homework Submission/ Presentation
16 Review of the semester

 

Course Notes/Textbooks

None

Suggested Readings/Materials
  • Thomas L. Schumacher (2005) Horizontality, Journal of Architectural Education, 59:1, 17-26, DOI: 10.1111/ j.1531-314X.2005.00002.x  Eloísa Petti Pinheiro (2012) New urban forms: the crescents of Bath and Le Corbusier's plan for Rio de Janeiro, Planning Perspectives, 27:1, 121-129, DOI: 10.1080/02665433.2012.629820 / 
  • Söderqvist, L. (2011). Structuralism in architecture: A definition, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 3(1), 5414. https://doi. org/10.3402/jac.v3i0.5414 
  • Jencks, C. (2011) The Story of Post-Modernism: Five Decades of the Ironic, Iconic and Critical in Architecture 1st Edition 
  • Wiley Venturi, Robert; Scott Brown, Denise, and Izenour, Steven (1977). Learning from Las Vegas. MIT Press. 
  • Mary McLeod (1989) “Architecture and Politics in the Reagan Era: From Postmodernism to Deconstructivism,” Assemblage 8. 
  • Coyne, Dr. R. (2020) “The Production of Architectural Criticism” Architectural Theory Review 16(2) . 
  • Peter Barry, Beginning Theory (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995) . 
  • C. Greg Crysler, Stephen Cairns and Hilde Heynen, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Architectural Theory (Sage Publications 2012). 
  • William W. Braham and Jonathan A. Hale, Rethinking Technology: A Reader in Architectural Theory (Oxford: Routledge 2007). 
  • Michael Dear, The Postmodern Urban Condition (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 2000). 
  • Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2003) 
  • Michael Hays, ed., Architecture Theory Since 1968 (Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press, 1998) 
  • Neil Leach, ed., Rethinking Architecture (London: Routledge, 1997) 
  • Harry Francis Mallgrave and Christiana Contandriopoulos, eds. Architectural Theory: An Anthology from 1871-2005, Volume II (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 2008). 
  • Kate Nesbitt, ed., Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996) 
  • Joan Ockman, ed., Architecture Culture 1943-1968 (New York: Rizzoli1993) 
  • John Reader, Cities: A Magisterial Exploration of the Nature and Impact of the City from Its Beginnings to the Mega-Conurbations of Today (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press 2004) 
  • Felicity D. Scott, Architecture of Techno-utopia: Politics After Modernism (Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press, 2007)

 

EVALUATION SYSTEM

Semester Activities Number Weigthing
Participation
1
8
Laboratory / Application
Field Work
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
Portfolio
Homework / Assignments
1
32
Presentation / Jury
4
20
Project
4
40
Seminar / Workshop
Oral Exams
Midterm
Final Exam
Total

Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade
7
100
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade
Total

ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE

Semester Activities Number Duration (Hours) Workload
Theoretical Course Hours
(Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
16
3
48
Laboratory / Application Hours
(Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours)
16
0
Study Hours Out of Class
12
7
84
Field Work
0
Quizzes / Studio Critiques
0
Portfolio
0
Homework / Assignments
8
1
8
Presentation / Jury
4
3
12
Project
4
18
72
Seminar / Workshop
0
Oral Exam
0
Midterms
0
Final Exam
0
    Total
224

 

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP

#
Program Competencies/Outcomes
* Contribution Level
1
2
3
4
5
1

To be able to advance specialized architectural knowledge based on qualifications acquired at the undergraduate level.

X
2

To be able to conceive the interdisciplinary nature of the architectural field and apply such knowledge and analytical capacity to interdisciplinary studies.

X
3

To be able to apply specialized knowledge in architecture in theoretical or practical work.

X
4

To be able to produce new knowledge by integrating architectural knowledge with knowledge in other disciplines.

X
5

To be able to diagnose and evaluate a specific problem in architecture and to relate this ability to publishing or practice.

X
6

To be able critically evaluate knowledge peculiar to the architectural field, facilitate self-directed learning and produce advanced work independently.

X
7

To be able to communicate contemporary developments in architecture and one’s own work in professional and interdisciplinary environments in written, oral or visual forms.

X
8

To be able to consider, control and communicate social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation, publication and/or application of architectural data.

X
9

To be able to critically analyze the norms that inform spatial relationships and their social implications and to develop original thesis according to guidelines.

10

To be able to keep up with developing knowledge in Architecture and participate in academic and professional discussions using at least one foreign language.

X

*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest

 


Izmir University of Economics
is an establishment of
izto logo
Izmir Chamber of Commerce Health and Education Foundation.
ieu logo

Sakarya Street No:156
35330 Balçova - İzmir / Turkey

kampus izmir

Follow Us

İEU © All rights reserved.