İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi
  • TÜRKÇE

  • GRADUATE SCHOOL

    M.SC. In Architecture (With Thesis)

    ARCH 553 | Course Introduction and Application Information

    Course Name
    Memory and Architecture
    Code
    Semester
    Theory
    (hour/week)
    Application/Lab
    (hour/week)
    Local Credits
    ECTS
    ARCH 553
    Fall/Spring
    3
    0
    3
    7.5

    Prerequisites
    None
    Course Language
    English
    Course Type
    Elective
    Course Level
    Second Cycle
    Mode of Delivery -
    Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course -
    National Occupation Classification -
    Course Coordinator -
    Course Lecturer(s)
    Assistant(s) -
    Course Objectives Understanding how memory affects architecture and also how architecture affects memory.
    Learning Outcomes

    The students who succeeded in this course;

    • Student will be able to explain the concept of individual memory.
    • Student will be able to explain the concept of collective memory.
    • Student will be able to identify “places of memory” or “sites of memory”.
    • Student will be able to analyze “places of memory” or “sites of memory”.
    • Student will be able to explain the role that the built environment plays in the process of memory construction.
    Course Description How memory affects architecture and how architecture affects memory

     



    Course Category

    Core Courses
    Major Area Courses
    X
    Supportive Courses
    Media and Management Skills Courses
    Transferable Skill Courses

     

    WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES

    Week Subjects Related Preparation Learning Outcome
    1 Introduction: Memory and the Built Environment Assmann, Jan, and John Czaplicka. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique, no. 65, 1995, pp. 125–133. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/488538
    2 Memorialization Sturken, M. (1991). The Wall, the Screen, and the Image: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Representations, (35), 118-142. doi:10.2307/2928719
    3 Presentation
    4 Memory and Art Foster, H. (2013). Image-Building. Art-architecture complex. London: Verso.
    5 Memory and Museum Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T. S., & Schnapp, J. T. (2016). Digital-humanities.
    6 Memory and Architecture Oxman, R., & Oxman, R. (2014). Theories of the digital in architecture. London: Routledge
    7 Presentation
    8 Reconstruction Yüksel, P. (2014). Reconstruction Of Collective Memory Through Spatial Representations Of İzmir Waterfront, Since The 1920s. Master Thesis., Middle East Technical University.
    9 Reconstruction
    10 Digital Reconstruction van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1-20.
    11 Digital Reconstruction
    12 Fabrication Kolarevic, B. (2009). Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing. New York: Taylor & Francis.
    13 Fabrication
    14 Presentation
    15 Review
    16 Review

     

    Course Notes/Textbooks None
    Suggested Readings/Materials
    • Assmann, Jan, and John Czaplicka. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique, no. 65, 1995, pp. 125–133. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/488538
    • Sturken, M. (1991). The Wall, the Screen, and the Image: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Representations, (35), 118-142. doi:10.2307/2928719
    • Foster, H. (2013). Image-Building. Art-architecture complex. London: Verso.
    • Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T. S., & Schnapp, J. T. (2016). Digital-humanities.
    • Oxman, R., & Oxman, R. (2014). Theories of the digital in architecture. London: Routledge.
    • Yüksel, P. (2014). Reconstruction Of Collective Memory Through Spatial Representations Of İzmir Waterfront, Since The 1920s. Master Thesis., Middle East Technical University.
    • van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1-20.
    • Kolarevic, B. (2009). Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing. New York: Taylor & Francis.

     

    EVALUATION SYSTEM

    Semester Activities Number Weigthing
    Participation
    1
    10
    Laboratory / Application
    Field Work
    Quizzes / Studio Critiques
    Portfolio
    Homework / Assignments
    1
    20
    Presentation / Jury
    1
    30
    Project
    1
    40
    Seminar / Workshop
    Oral Exams
    Midterm
    Final Exam
    Total

    Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade
    4
    100
    Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade
    Total

    ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE

    Semester Activities Number Duration (Hours) Workload
    Theoretical Course Hours
    (Including exam week: 16 x total hours)
    16
    3
    48
    Laboratory / Application Hours
    (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours)
    16
    0
    Study Hours Out of Class
    0
    Field Work
    0
    Quizzes / Studio Critiques
    0
    Portfolio
    0
    Homework / Assignments
    1
    40
    40
    Presentation / Jury
    1
    40
    40
    Project
    1
    100
    100
    Seminar / Workshop
    0
    Oral Exam
    0
    Midterms
    0
    Final Exam
    0
        Total
    228

     

    COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP

    #
    PC Sub Program Competencies/Outcomes
    * Contribution Level
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    1

    To be able to advance specialized architectural knowledge based on qualifications acquired at the undergraduate level.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    X
    2

    To be able to conceive the interdisciplinary nature of the architectural field and apply such knowledge and analytical capacity to interdisciplinary studies.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    X
    3

    To be able to apply specialized knowledge in architecture in theoretical or practical work.

    -
    -
    X
    -
    -
    4

    To be able to produce new knowledge by integrating architectural knowledge with knowledge in other disciplines.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    X
    5

    To be able to diagnose and evaluate a specific problem in architecture and to relate this ability to publishing or practice.

    -
    -
    X
    -
    -
    6

    To be able critically evaluate knowledge peculiar to the architectural field, facilitate self-directed learning and produce advanced work independently.

    -
    -
    X
    -
    -
    7

    To be able to communicate contemporary developments in architecture and one’s own work in professional and interdisciplinary environments in written, oral or visual forms.

    -
    -
    X
    -
    -
    8

    To be able to consider, control and communicate social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation, publication and/or application of architectural data.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    X
    9

    To be able to critically analyze the norms that inform spatial relationships and their social implications and to develop original thesis according to guidelines.

    -
    -
    -
    -
    X
    10

    To be able to keep up with developing knowledge in Architecture and participate in academic and professional discussions using at least one foreign language.

    -
    -
    X
    -
    -

    *1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest

     


    NEW GÜZELBAHÇE CAMPUS

    Details

    GLOBAL CAREER

    As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.

    More..

    CONTRIBUTION TO SCIENCE

    Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.

    More..

    VALUING PEOPLE

    Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.

    More..

    BENEFIT TO SOCIETY

    Transferring 22 years of power and experience to social work…

    More..
    You are one step ahead with your graduate education at Izmir University of Economics.