GRADUATE SCHOOL
M.SC. In Architecture (With Thesis)
ARCH 553 | Course Introduction and Application Information
Course Name |
Memory and Architecture
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
ARCH 553
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | Understanding how memory affects architecture and also how architecture affects memory. |
Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description | How memory affects architecture and how architecture affects memory |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
1 | Introduction: Memory and the Built Environment | Assmann, Jan, and John Czaplicka. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique, no. 65, 1995, pp. 125–133. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/488538 |
2 | Memorialization | Sturken, M. (1991). The Wall, the Screen, and the Image: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Representations, (35), 118-142. doi:10.2307/2928719 |
3 | Presentation | |
4 | Memory and Art | Foster, H. (2013). Image-Building. Art-architecture complex. London: Verso. |
5 | Memory and Museum | Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T. S., & Schnapp, J. T. (2016). Digital-humanities. |
6 | Memory and Architecture | Oxman, R., & Oxman, R. (2014). Theories of the digital in architecture. London: Routledge |
7 | Presentation | |
8 | Reconstruction | Yüksel, P. (2014). Reconstruction Of Collective Memory Through Spatial Representations Of İzmir Waterfront, Since The 1920s. Master Thesis., Middle East Technical University. |
9 | Reconstruction | |
10 | Digital Reconstruction | van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1-20. |
11 | Digital Reconstruction | |
12 | Fabrication | Kolarevic, B. (2009). Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing. New York: Taylor & Francis. |
13 | Fabrication | |
14 | Presentation | |
15 | Review | |
16 | Review |
Course Notes/Textbooks | None |
Suggested Readings/Materials |
|
EVALUATION SYSTEM
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation |
1
|
10
|
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
20
|
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
30
|
Project |
1
|
40
|
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exams | ||
Midterm | ||
Final Exam | ||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
4
|
100
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
0
|
||
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
40
|
40
|
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
40
|
40
|
Project |
1
|
100
|
100
|
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
0
|
||
Final Exam |
0
|
||
Total |
228
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
1 | To be able to advance specialized architectural knowledge based on qualifications acquired at the undergraduate level. |
X | ||||
2 | To be able to conceive the interdisciplinary nature of the architectural field and apply such knowledge and analytical capacity to interdisciplinary studies. |
X | ||||
3 | To be able to apply specialized knowledge in architecture in theoretical or practical work. |
X | ||||
4 | To be able to produce new knowledge by integrating architectural knowledge with knowledge in other disciplines. |
X | ||||
5 | To be able to diagnose and evaluate a specific problem in architecture and to relate this ability to publishing or practice. |
X | ||||
6 | To be able critically evaluate knowledge peculiar to the architectural field, facilitate self-directed learning and produce advanced work independently. |
X | ||||
7 | To be able to communicate contemporary developments in architecture and one’s own work in professional and interdisciplinary environments in written, oral or visual forms. |
X | ||||
8 | To be able to consider, control and communicate social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation, publication and/or application of architectural data. |
X | ||||
9 | To be able to critically analyze the norms that inform spatial relationships and their social implications and to develop original thesis according to guidelines. |
X | ||||
10 | To be able to keep up with developing knowledge in Architecture and participate in academic and professional discussions using at least one foreign language. |
X |
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest