Course Name |
Memory and Architecture
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
ARCH 553
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | Understanding how memory affects architecture and also how architecture affects memory. |
Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
Course Description | How memory affects architecture and how architecture affects memory |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation | Learning Outcome |
1 | Introduction: Memory and the Built Environment | Assmann, Jan, and John Czaplicka. “Collective Memory and Cultural Identity.” New German Critique, no. 65, 1995, pp. 125–133. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/488538 | |
2 | Memorialization | Sturken, M. (1991). The Wall, the Screen, and the Image: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Representations, (35), 118-142. doi:10.2307/2928719 | |
3 | Presentation | ||
4 | Memory and Art | Foster, H. (2013). Image-Building. Art-architecture complex. London: Verso. | |
5 | Memory and Museum | Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T. S., & Schnapp, J. T. (2016). Digital-humanities. | |
6 | Memory and Architecture | Oxman, R., & Oxman, R. (2014). Theories of the digital in architecture. London: Routledge | |
7 | Presentation | ||
8 | Reconstruction | Yüksel, P. (2014). Reconstruction Of Collective Memory Through Spatial Representations Of İzmir Waterfront, Since The 1920s. Master Thesis., Middle East Technical University. | |
9 | Reconstruction | ||
10 | Digital Reconstruction | van Krevelen, D. W. F., & Poelman, R. (2010). A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1-20. | |
11 | Digital Reconstruction | ||
12 | Fabrication | Kolarevic, B. (2009). Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing. New York: Taylor & Francis. | |
13 | Fabrication | ||
14 | Presentation | ||
15 | Review | ||
16 | Review |
Course Notes/Textbooks | None |
Suggested Readings/Materials |
|
Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
Participation |
1
|
10
|
Laboratory / Application | ||
Field Work | ||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
Portfolio | ||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
20
|
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
30
|
Project |
1
|
40
|
Seminar / Workshop | ||
Oral Exams | ||
Midterm | ||
Final Exam | ||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
4
|
100
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
0
|
||
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
40
|
40
|
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
40
|
40
|
Project |
1
|
100
|
100
|
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
0
|
||
Final Exam |
0
|
||
Total |
228
|
#
|
PC Sub | Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
1 |
To be able to advance specialized architectural knowledge based on qualifications acquired at the undergraduate level. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
2 |
To be able to conceive the interdisciplinary nature of the architectural field and apply such knowledge and analytical capacity to interdisciplinary studies. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
3 |
To be able to apply specialized knowledge in architecture in theoretical or practical work. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
4 |
To be able to produce new knowledge by integrating architectural knowledge with knowledge in other disciplines. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
5 |
To be able to diagnose and evaluate a specific problem in architecture and to relate this ability to publishing or practice. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
6 |
To be able critically evaluate knowledge peculiar to the architectural field, facilitate self-directed learning and produce advanced work independently. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
7 |
To be able to communicate contemporary developments in architecture and one’s own work in professional and interdisciplinary environments in written, oral or visual forms. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
8 |
To be able to consider, control and communicate social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation, publication and/or application of architectural data. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
9 |
To be able to critically analyze the norms that inform spatial relationships and their social implications and to develop original thesis according to guidelines. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
10 |
To be able to keep up with developing knowledge in Architecture and participate in academic and professional discussions using at least one foreign language. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..