Course Name |
Theories of Space
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
ARCH 555
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
Course Language |
English
|
|||||
Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
Course Coordinator | - | |||||
Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
Assistant(s) | - |
Course Objectives | Understanding the theories of space in architecture. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Learning Outcomes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Course Description | The seminar covers the critical theories of space after the mid-20th century for a better understanding of architectural theory. |
|
Core Courses | |
Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
Supportive Courses | ||
Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
Transferable Skill Courses |
Week | Subjects | Related Preparation | Learning Outcome |
1 | Introduction: What is Space? | ||
2 | Discussions on Theories of Space | • Harvey, D. (2008) Ch14: Space as a Keyword, David Harvey: A Critical Reader, Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp. 270-293. • Lawrence, D. L. & Low S. M. (1990) The Built Environment and Spatial Form, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 19, pp. 453-505. | |
3 | Space as Place | • Cresswell, T (2004) Ch1: The Genealogy of Place, Place A Short Introduction, Blackwell, pp. 15-51. • Unwin, S. (2003) Ch4: Constructing Place… on the Beach, S. Menin (ed.) Constructing Place Mind and Matter, London & New York: Routledge, pp. 77-86. | |
4 | Space as Place | • Dovey, K (1999) Ch 4: Place, Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form, Routledge, pp. 39-52. • Gregory, T. (2011) The Rise of the Productive Non-Place: The Contemporary Office as a State of Exception, Space and Culture, 14/3, pp. 244-258. | |
5 | Space as Dwelling | • Heidegger, M. (1993) Building Dwelling Thinking, in Basic Writings, San Francisco: Harper and Row, pp. 343-364. • Verschaffel, B. (2006) The Meanings of Domesticity, J. Madge & A. Peckham (ed.) Narrating Architecture A Retrospective Anthology, London & New York: Routledge, pp. 243-252. | |
6 | Mid-Review | ||
7 | Mid-Term 1 | ||
8 | Space as Production | • Lefebvre, H. (1991) Social Space, The Production of Space, UK: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 68-168. • Wiedmann, F., Salama, M. A., Thierstein, A. (2012) Urban Evolution of City of Doha: An Investigation to the Impact of Economic Transformations of Urban Structures, METU Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 29/2, pp. 35-61. | |
9 | Postcolonial Space | • Rutherford, J. (1990) The Third Space. Interview with Homi Bhabha. Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 207-221. • Biln, J. (1997) (De)forming Self and Other: Towards and Ethics of Distance,” in G. Baydar Nalbantoglu & W. C. Thai (ed.) Postcolonial Space(s), New York: Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 25-38. | |
10 | Sexualized Space | • McDowell, L. (2004) Ch 2: In and Out of Place: Bodies and Embodiment, Gender, Identity and Place Understanding Feminist Geographies, UK: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 34-70. • Colomina B. (2000) The Split Wall: Domestic Voyeurism, in J. Rendell (ed.) Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, New York & London: Routledge, pp. 314-320. | |
11 | Queer Space | • Urbach, H. (2000) Closets, Clothes, disclosure, J. Rendell (ed.) Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, New York & London: Routledge, pp. 342-352. • Christopher R. (1996) Imminent Domain: Queer Space in the Built Environment, Art Journal, 55/4, pp. 64-70. | |
12 | Mid-Review | ||
13 | Mid Term 2 | ||
14 | Preliminary Representation of the Final Project | Research | |
15 | Preliminary Representation of the Final Project | Research | |
16 | Preliminary Representation of the Final Project | Research |
Course Notes/Textbooks | There is no single textbook is available for this course. Readings will be assigned weekly. |
Suggested Readings/Materials |
|
Semester Activities | Number | Weighting | LO 1 | LO 2 | LO 3 | LO 4 | LO 5 |
Participation |
1
|
10
|
|||||
Laboratory / Application | |||||||
Field Work | |||||||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||||||
Portfolio | |||||||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
40
|
|||||
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
10
|
|||||
Project |
2
|
40
|
|||||
Seminar / Workshop | |||||||
Oral Exams | |||||||
Midterm | |||||||
Final Exam | |||||||
Total |
Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
5
|
100
|
Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | ||
Total |
Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
---|---|---|---|
Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
Study Hours Out of Class |
12
|
9
|
108
|
Field Work |
0
|
||
Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
Portfolio |
0
|
||
Homework / Assignments |
1
|
48
|
48
|
Presentation / Jury |
1
|
3
|
3
|
Project |
2
|
9
|
18
|
Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
Oral Exam |
0
|
||
Midterms |
0
|
||
Final Exam |
0
|
||
Total |
225
|
#
|
PC Sub | Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
1 |
To be able to advance specialized architectural knowledge based on qualifications acquired at the undergraduate level. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
2 |
To be able to conceive the interdisciplinary nature of the architectural field and apply such knowledge and analytical capacity to interdisciplinary studies. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
3 |
To be able to apply specialized knowledge in architecture in theoretical or practical work. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
4 |
To be able to produce new knowledge by integrating architectural knowledge with knowledge in other disciplines. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
5 |
To be able to diagnose and evaluate a specific problem in architecture and to relate this ability to publishing or practice. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
6 |
To be able critically evaluate knowledge peculiar to the architectural field, facilitate self-directed learning and produce advanced work independently. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
7 |
To be able to communicate contemporary developments in architecture and one’s own work in professional and interdisciplinary environments in written, oral or visual forms. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
|
8 |
To be able to consider, control and communicate social, scientific and ethical values in the accumulation, interpretation, publication and/or application of architectural data. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
9 |
To be able to critically analyze the norms that inform spatial relationships and their social implications and to develop original thesis according to guidelines. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
|
10 |
To be able to keep up with developing knowledge in Architecture and participate in academic and professional discussions using at least one foreign language. |
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..