GRADUATE SCHOOL
Private Law Graduate Program (With Thesis)
HUK 564 | Course Introduction and Application Information
| Course Name |
Private Law Disputes in the application of the European Convention of Human Rights
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
HUK 564
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
7.5
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
Turkish
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
Second Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | ||||||
| Course Objectives | The ultimate goal of this course is to know what the fundamental rights are in cases relating to private law and also know how to protect them. Therefore, we must examine the legal texts and tools (constitution, European Convention on Human Rights etc..) and their applications. As the cornerstone of the way of individual application (constitutional complaint) before the Constitutional Court, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights also provides a vast and rich source. In the light of the European Convention on Human Rights, the fundamental rights, which should be protected in the private law disputes, will be examined in connection with the case law related articles. Thus, we obtain the necessary knowledge on the possibilities to uphold human rights in international law concerning cases of private law. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The mechanism of individual applications; Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the field of private law; special convention expressions, like “determination of his civil rights and obligations”; procedural rights; Binding force and execution of judgments. |
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses |
X
|
|
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | The Council of Europe – establishment, structure European Convention on Human Rights- General presentation | Council of Europe: http://hub.coe.int/web/coe-portal; Statute of Council of Europe: Treaty Office; A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 3-30. |
| 2 | The European Court of Human Rights- General presentation and execution of judgments | Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 105-129; http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home&c=fra |
| 3 | Regional human rights protection systems and ECHR | Halil Kalabalık, İnsan Hakları Hukuku, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013, Bölüm: İnsan Haklarının Birleşmiş Milletler Düzeyinde Korunması ve İnsan Haklarının Bölgesel Düzeyde (Avrupa, Amerika, Afrika) Korunması. |
| 4 | Comparison of two systems: Individual application in Constitutional Court and ECHR | Halil Kalabalık, İnsan Hakları Hukuku, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013, Bölüm: İnsan Haklarının İç Hukukta Korunması - Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Yolu; http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/BireyselBasvuru/ |
| 5 | Individual applications: Review of Admissibility criteria (procedural grounds for inadmissibility: non-exhaustion of domestic remedies; Grounds for inadmissibility relating to the courts jurisdiction : incompatibility ratione matariae, ratione personae, ratione loci,, ratione temporis, ratione materiae) | Art. 33, 34 and 35 of the Convention ; A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 31-100 ; http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_TUR.pdf |
| 6 | Case Study | |
| 7 | Midterm exam | |
| 8 | Articles 13, 14 and 15 (Right to a fair trial, Right to an effective remedy, Prohibition of discrimination, Derogation in time of emergency) | Review of the text (ECHR) and research of case law ; Prof. Dr. Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa, Beta Yayıncılık, Ekim 2013, 3. Baskı, Bölüm: Devletin Pozitif Yükümlülükleri ve Dolaylı Yatay Etki; A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 392-409. |
| 9 | Article 6- Right to a fair trial | A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 265-315 ; Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, 2013 Mart, 4. Baskı, Bölüm: 6. Madde. |
| 10 | Article 6- Right to a fair trial. | AİHS metni ve HUDOC veri tabanı üzerinden karar incelemesi, AİHM, Nejdet Şahin ve Perihan Şahin/Türkiye başvurusu incelemesi, no. 13279/05 [BD], 20 Ekim 2011. |
| 11 | Article 8- Right to respect for private and family life. | Prof. Dr. Osman Doğru, Dr. Atilla Nalbant, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi, Açıklama ve Önemli Kararlar, Cilt:2, Legal Yayıncılık, 2013, 1. Baskı. Bölüm: Özel ve Aile Yaşamına, Konuta ve Haberleşmeye Saygı Hakkı; A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 330-343.AİHS metni ve HUDOC veri tabanı üzerinden karar incelemesi: AİHM, Tekeli/Türkiye başvurusu, no.29865/96, 16 Kasım 2004. Opuz/Türkiye başvurusu, no. 33401/02, 9 Haziran 2009. |
| 12 | Article 9 Freedom of thought, conscience and religion | A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 346-356 and p. 372-…, researches of the case law (Hudoc); Buscarini and others/Saint-Marin, no. 24645/94. |
| 13 | Article 10 - Freedom of expression and Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association | A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 356-367; Researches of the case law (Hudoc); ECHR, Ahmet Yıldırım/ Türkiye, no. 3111/10, 18 Aralık 2012; ECHR, Case of Chassagnou and others/France, 25088/94, …[ BD ] 29/04/1999. |
| 14 | Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms -ARTICLE 1- Protection of property | A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, 10. Baskı, Turhan, Ankara, 2013, p. 417-432; Mehmet Akif Etgü, Kamu Hukukunda Mülkiyet Hakkı ve Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi'nin Mülkiyet Hakkına Bakışı, On iki Levha Yayıncılık, p. 201-244; Researches of the case law (Hudoc). |
| 15 | Case study | |
| 16 | Final |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Feyyaz Gölcüklü, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İnceleme ve Yargılama Yöntemi, Turhan, 2013, 10. Baskı. |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı Kamu ve Özel Hukuk Alanlarında Ortak Yargısal Hak ve İlkeler, Beta, 2013 Mart, 4. Baskı; Mehmet Semih Gemalmaz, Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukukunun Genel Teorisine Giriş Cilt 1, Legal, 2012 Aralık, 8. Baskı; HUDOC database; Anayasa Mahkemesi (web, database); Mehmet Akif Etgü, Kamu Hukukunda Mülkiyet Hakkı Ve Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi'nin Mülkiyet Hakkına Bakışı, Oniki Levha Yayıncılık; Prof. Dr. Osman Doğru, Dr. Atilla Nalbant, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi, Açıklama ve Önemli Kararlar, Cilt:2, Legal Yayıncılık, 2013, 1. Baskı; Prof. Dr. Sibel İnceoğlu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa, Beta Yayıncılık, Ekim 2013, 3. Baskı; Halil Kalabalık, İnsan Hakları Hukuku, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013; http://hub.coe.int/web/coe-portal; http://www.corteidh.or.cr; http://www.african-court.org/en/; http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/BireyselBasvuru; http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home&c=fra. |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation | ||
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
20
|
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
1
|
40
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
40
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
60
|
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
40
|
|
| Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
16
|
3
|
48
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
33
|
33
|
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
1
|
43
|
43
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
53
|
53
|
| Total |
225
|
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|||
| 1 | To consolidate the ability of interpretation of events on the basis of legal principles by analytical thinking in the field of private law. | X | |||||
| 2 | The acquisition of knowledge on private law and its sub-disciplines. | X | |||||
| 3 | To generate new information putting together the knowledge of various disciplines with theoretical and applied ones that are gained from expert level of private law. | X | |||||
| 4 | To have the ability for utilizing theoretical and applied knowledge gaining from expert level of private law on the analysis of the problems. | X | |||||
| 5 |
|
X | |||||
| 6 | To be able to convey the expert level of knowledge and equipment that will be possessed on private law and its sub-disciplines effectively verbally and in writing. | X | |||||
| 7 | To be able to solve legal disputes, particularly those brought before the judicial bodies. | X | |||||
| 8 | To be able to have effective communication skills. | X | |||||
| 9 | To pursue social, scientific and ethical values during the processing and evaluation of knowledge. | X | |||||
| 10 | To be able to conduct an independent study that requires specialty in the field of private law and about its sub-disciplines. | X | |||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest